Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "984622".
Did you mean:
984522
2014 Apr 18
2
[PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I am confused by your notation.
Nah, I think I was confused :-) Make the 1 _Q_LOCKED_VAL though, as
that's the proper constant to use.