Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "98317b10".
Did you mean:
38317310
2011 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] The nsw story
Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes:
> Prohibiting poison values from propogating through memory would mean
> that the reg2mem pass would no longer be a semantics-preserving pass.
Or it means you couldn't demote those values.
> Prohibiting it from propogating through control flow would mean that a
> select instruction wouldn't be equivalent to a conditional branch
2011 Nov 30
2
[LLVMdev] The nsw story
On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Paul Robinson wrote:
> Part of the confusion seems to come from overloading "undefined."
> The VAX architecture spec nicely dealt with the distinction between
> unspecified results and unspecified behavior by consistently using
> distinct terms: _unpredictable_ results, and _undefined_ behavior.
> An operation producing an unpredictable
2011 Dec 05
3
[LLVMdev] The nsw story
...ted
as being observable locations.
So, it's not really "all of memory" that could be poisoned, only these
compiler-generated things.
Pogo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111205/98317b10/attachment.html>