Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "982,82".
Did you mean:
982,12
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...t;lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &mstb->ports, next) {
list_del(&port->next);
- drm_dp_put_port(port);
+ drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
/* drop any tx slots msg */
mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
@@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
if (wake_tx)
wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
- kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
+ drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
}
-static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)...
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...ort(port);
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
Would be nice to split this out (to highlight the bugfix more), but
because of the kref_init() hack not really feasible I think :-/
>
> /* drop any tx slots msg */
> mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
> if (wake_tx)
> wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
>
> - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> }
>
> -static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch...
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...> > Would be nice to split this out (to highlight the bugfix more), but
> > because of the kref_init() hack not really feasible I think :-/
> > >
> > > /* drop any tx slots msg */
> > > mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > > @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct
> > > kref *kref)
> > > if (wake_tx)
> > > wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> > >
> > > - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> > > + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_mal...
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...lock(&mgr->lock);
>
> Would be nice to split this out (to highlight the bugfix more), but
> because of the kref_init() hack not really feasible I think :-/
> >
> > /* drop any tx slots msg */
> > mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct
> > kref *kref)
> > if (wake_tx)
> > wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> >
> > - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> > + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> > }
> &...
2018 Dec 14
22
[WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now
to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST
helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns
out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port
and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense,
since the current upstream