search for: 980x

> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > the most affect on performance: > (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) during downloads. There is no encryption because the samba VM it is over vpn  (I get fulls speed with FTP over VPN) For the rest I will test your hints. Kind Regards Knut

Knut Krüger via samba wrote: >> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had >> the most affect on performance: >> (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) >> > The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core > i7-980x and a Raid 10 Disk array. > The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) > during downloads. > --- In protocols before cifsV3, only 1 tcp connection was allowed between a user at workstation and a server. So multi-cores make no difference. When...

A lot of us wouldn't be here without him. DEC made good, really reliable hardware. mark <http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/020711-kenneth-olsen-dec-obit.html>

What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share? I have a 100 kbit/s Internet The maximum speed for a download from my  webserver with samba is about 25.000 kbit/s The bottleneck is the samba access.  Without samba  I can download with 100 kbit/s So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum speed with samba? I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but

...t; >>> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > >>> the most affect on performance: > >>> (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) > >> The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz > CPU (Intel > >> Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. > >> The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver > >> traffic) during downloads. > > --- > >    In protocols before cifsV3, only 1 tcp connection was > allowed between > > a user at workstation and a server. ...