search for: 98058f99

Hi, I've been upgrading some custom LLVM passes to work with LLVM 2.6 instead of LLVM 2.5. I've noticed that in 2.6, some functions seem to have several local values with no name (where getName() returns an empty string). I never saw this in 2.5. Is this a known change in behaviour? Is there some handy way to get unique, deterministic names assigned to all values in a function? Thanks,

...to all values in a function? Run the -instnamer pass. --Owen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2620 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091113/98058f99/attachment.bin>