search for: 977

...g on a Fedora 28 workstation. When I attempt to connect to the share with smbclient using this command: `smbclient //server.domain.com/SHARED -U DOMAIN.COM\\jsmith` I enter my password, it works and appears to auth with kerberos: ``` [2019/01/22 13:23:53.850746, 3] ../auth/gensec/gensec_start.c:977(gensec_register) GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered [2019/01/22 13:23:53.850783, 3] ../auth/gensec/gensec_start.c:977(gensec_register) GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered [2019/01/22 13:23:53.850808, 3] ../auth/gensec/gensec_start.c:977(gensec_register) GENSEC bac...

....08 1503 7930.3 0 AA 2010 SUM Open 2 169.427001 491.87 1503.31 5101.09 0 AA 2010 AUT oldHard 2 169.427001 491.87 1503.31 5101.09 16 AA 2011 SPR oldHard 2 169.427001 491.87 1503.31 5101.09 0 AA 2009 SUM oldHard 2 169.427001 491.87 1503.31 5101.09 0 AA 2010 SUM oldHard ? 563 86.777099 612.69 977 4474.6 62 AA 2010 AUT Water 563 86.777099 612.69 977 4474.6 12 AA 2011 SPR Water 563 86.777099 612.69 977 4474.6 55 AA 2009 SUM Water 1 160.565994 729.08 1503 7930.3 0 BB 2010 SUM Open 2 169.427001 491.87 1503.31 5101.09 72 BB 2010 SUM oldHard 5 160.75 614.95 1503.31 2878.98 16...

Hi! Trying to figure out how to rewrite calling number of an incoming call... A cell phone (0733025975) dials a X-Lite (977). X-Lite "shows" 733025975 at the display, but I want it to be 0317998975. I thought i could do something like: exten => 977/733025975,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=0317998975) exten => 977,n,Dial(SIP/0317998977) [Dec 14 19:07:43] NOTICE[20731]: chan_h323.c:2272 answer_call: Dropping cal...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 Summary: duplicate log entries when using "sshd -D -e" Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd Ass...

...empting to find an auth method to match > sam_ignoredomain > [2020/03/14 00:37:17.073390, 5] > ../../source3/auth/auth.c:448(load_auth_module) > load_auth_module: auth method sam_ignoredomain has a valid init > [2020/03/14 00:37:17.083334, 3] > ../../auth/gensec/gensec_start.c:977(gensec_register) > GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered > [2020/03/14 00:37:17.083497, 3] > ../../auth/gensec/gensec_start.c:977(gensec_register) > GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered > [2020/03/14 00:37:17.083597, 3] > ../../auth/gensec/gensec_start...

Hi, I have a Samba4 File Server on Debian 10 I am not being able to assign permissions on shares to groups that already have the Unix attribute set. Groups without the Unix attribute are working OK. My two DC are Samba4 (migrated of the Windows 2008 Server) and my current File Servers are Windows 2008 Server. I followed "Setting up a Share Using Windows ACLs" tutorial (

And this is some Samba logs from a connect where the profile isn't handled properly. Near the end, it looks like Samba resets this connection... (I could be wrong - I know nothing about how to read Samba logs.) --- [2019/01/24 10:36:38.097773, 3] ../lib/util/access.c:361(allow_access) Allowed connection from 10.8.20.60 (10.8.20.60) [2019/01/24 10:36:38.097869, 3] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:1329(init_oplocks) init_oplocks: initializing messages. [2019/01/24 10:36:38.097940, 3] ../source3/smbd/process.c:1959(process_smb) Transact...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #5 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- I'm now using Shorewall 4.6.4.3, but I don't think it makes a difference. I was thinking to try kernel 3.17,2, but not sure it's going to make any difference either. I'm not sure how this is a configuration error, I'...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #6 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- I upgraded to ulogd 2.0.4 & kernel 3.17.2 but these did not make a difference, here's how the output looks now; Sat Nov 1 17:07:03 2014 <5> ulogd.c:843 building new pluginstance stack: 'log2:NFLOG,base1:BASE,ifi1:IFIN...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #7 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- TYPO before; If you notice you'll see it says log2 on top, then log21 below, both are getting these messages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTM...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #8 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- CRAP my typing sorry... If you notice you'll see it says log2 on top, then LOG1 below... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scru...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #9 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Hi Eric, Have you had a chance to look at this? I know you're probably really busy and have more important things to deal with, but I could really use some help getting this to work because it doesn't. This is not a end-user c...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #10 from Eric Leblond <eric at regit.org> --- Hi, Sorry for being so long to answer. Can you add an iptables-save output to the ticket (or sent it to me privately if you need to) ? I really don't get what's going on and with that info I will be able to improve diagnosti...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #11 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Hi Eric, Thanks for getting back to me, really appreciate it. I'm not using NFLOG at the moment, so let me know if the iptables-save is ok, without using it at the moment, along with the cat? I've attached two logs for each.....

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #12 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Created attachment 455 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=455&action=edit iptables-save -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HT...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #13 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Created attachment 456 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=456&action=edit nf_log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML atta...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #14 from Eric Leblond <eric at regit.org> --- (In reply to Netbug from comment #11) > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for getting back to me, really appreciate it. > > I'm not using NFLOG at the moment, so let me know if the iptables-save is > ok, without using it at...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #15 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Ok I was thinking this so I set everything back to NFLOG, I've attached; iptables-save_nflog Here's the cat /proc/net/netfilter/nf_log; 0 NONE (nfnetlink_log) 1 NONE (nfnetlink_log) 2 nfnetlink_log (nf_log_ipv4,nfnetlink_...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #16 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- Created attachment 457 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=457&action=edit iptables-save_nflog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part --------------...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 --- Comment #17 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> --- I screwed up the iptables-save_nflog, don't use that one I'm going to brb and upload a new one, my bad... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTM...