Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9751708a".
2015 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC][PATCH][OPENCL] synchronization scopes redux
...ets may not have those scopes.
Is this correct? But how does this work in the SelectionDAG? Also, what
will this look like in TableGen files?
Sameer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150108/9751708a/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 07
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC][PATCH][OPENCL] synchronization scopes redux
On 1/7/2015 8:59 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> Essentially, I think target-independent optimizations are still
> attractive, but we might want to just force them to go through an
> actual target-implemented API to interpret the scopes rather than
> making the interpretation work from first principles. I just worry
> that the targets are going to be too different and we may