Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9747c524".
Did you mean:
2747524
2013 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: JIT + AVX segfaults
...more likely to get fixed. The aim is to
deprecate the old JIT as soon as possible, so solving problems in it don't
get priority. ;)
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131111/9747c524/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: JIT + AVX segfaults
It's not much.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7f6506b in ?? ()
#1 0x000000000045d01a in main () at main.cc:165
Line 165 is the call to the function that was compiled by the JIT'er.
Meaning that JIT'ing the function went well, but the code or the pointer
are somehow corrupt.
There is no particular reason why I am working with the legacy
interface. Would you recommend to use the MCJIT