Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "97220".
Did you mean:
27220
2006 Jun 05
4
Swap memory: I can't reconcile this stuff.
...top and sort on it. Here's an edited snippet
of the results.
Mem: 775708k total, 764752k used, 10956k free, 60780k buffers
Swap: 1572856k total, 160k used, 1572696k free, 377324k cached
PID VIRT RES SHR %MEM SWAP COMMAND
24729 127m 32m 15m 4.3 94m evolution
3409 97220 5268 4304 0.7 89m evolution-data-
2851 115m 36m 7120 4.8 79m X
10937 109m 45m 14m 6.0 63m firefox-bin
3417 63076 7876 6756 1.0 53m evolution-alarm
3363 40332 7284 6228 0.9 32m eggcups
24745 37480 8176 6876 1.1 28m evolution-excha
3736 53272 29m 8660 3.9 22m gnome-terminal
3...
2006 Jul 27
7
suspicious memory usages
...ervers from out ~/public/app
directories.
We also run a cluster of mongrel servers using apache2.2.
Is this much memory use normal?
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
13982 prashant 16 0 147m 110m 3956 S 0.0 11.0 0:48.57 mongrel_rails
22665 mongrel 16 0 97220 56m 3396 S 0.0 5.6 0:06.66 mongrel_rails
22070 rags 16 0 88640 54m 3936 R 0.0 5.4 0:41.97 mongrel_rails
22671 mongrel 16 0 86160 49m 3432 S 0.0 4.9 0:04.74 mongrel_rails
21260 hemant 16 0 87164 48m 3400 S 0.0 4.8 0:06.09 mongrel_rails
22668 mongrel 16 0 75976...
2006 Aug 05
0
Memory Usage after upgrading to pre-release and removing sendfile
...nd Mongrel 0.3.13.4.
After I removed sendfile and upgraded to pre-release, I admit it has gone a
little high.Previously it was
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 13982 foo 16 0 147m 110m 3956 S 0.0 11.0 0:48.57 mongrel_rails
> 22665 mongrel 16 0 97220 56m 3396 S 0.0 5.6 0:06.66 mongrel_rails
> 22070 rags 16 0 88640 54m 3936 R 0.0 5.4 0:41.97 mongrel_rails
> 22671 mongrel 16 0 86160 49m 3432 S 0.0 4.9 0:04.74 mongrel_rails
> 21260 flipl 16 0 87164 48m 3400 S 0.0 4.8 0:06.09 mongrel_rails
> 22668 mongrel...