search for: 96m

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 10 October 2017 at 09:55, KM <info4km at yahoo.com> wrote: > > First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition. When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size. it's too small and I

...1M llvm-split 131M llvm-mc 127M llvm-pdbutil 126M clang-offload-bundler 122M llvm-mca 121M verify-uselistorder 121M llvm-cat 120M llvm-as 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer 116M llvm-modextract 114M obj2yaml 112M llvm-xray 105M sanstats 105M llvm-symbolizer 96M llvm-readobj 93M llvm-cov 90M lli-child-target 86M llvm-cxxdump 85M llvm-objcopy 83M llvm-cvtres 82M llvm-size 76M clang-apply-replacements 75M clang-format 64M llvm-diff 59M llvm-dis 53M llvm-stress 50M llvm-tblgen 48M llvm-profdata 31M yaml2obj 17M clang-tblgen - r...

...server....in case anyone wants to say anymore.? Thanks in advance. > Filesystem??????????? Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root > ?????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% / > tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm > /dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot > /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home > ????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home Your root filesystem is in an LVM volume. CentOS 6 is still using GRUB legacy, which does not support /boot in LVM. For you, there really is no way around the messy and delicate proce...

...ffload-bundler > 122M llvm-mca > 121M verify-uselistorder > 121M llvm-cat > 120M llvm-as > 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer > 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer > 116M llvm-modextract > 114M obj2yaml > 112M llvm-xray > 105M sanstats > 105M llvm-symbolizer > 96M llvm-readobj > 93M llvm-cov > 90M lli-child-target > 86M llvm-cxxdump > 85M llvm-objcopy > 83M llvm-cvtres > 82M llvm-size > 76M clang-apply-replacements > 75M clang-format > 64M llvm-diff > 59M llvm-dis > 53M llvm-stress > 50M llvm-tblgen...

On 10/10/2017 6:20 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: >> Filesystem Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root >> ??????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% / >> tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm >> /dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot >> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home >> ?????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home > > Your root filesystem is in an LVM volume. CentOS 6 is still using GRUB > legacy, which does not support /boot in LVM. says up there, /boot is /dev/sda1, this is...

...e flags = 0 Local flocks = FALSE Local caching = FALSE Type Total Used Free use% ------------------------------------------------------------------------ data 3T 1T 1T 47% inodes 1T 96M 1T 0% Hdparm information of the disk: hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 20988 MB in 2.00 seconds = 10512.28 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 74 MB in 3.05 seconds = 24.30 MB/sec Has someone an idea about increasing the performance of my gfs2 files...

...rent partitioning on the server....in case anyone wants to say anymore.? Thanks in advance. Filesystem??????????? Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root ?????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% / tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home ????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home Most of this is like speaking another language to me anyway.? I'll consider it all. KM On ?Tuesday?, ?October? ?10?, ?2017? ?10?:?42?:?21? ?AM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham...

...8 35566479+ ee EFI GPT ========================================================================================= > [root at advaitha /]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda5 9.9G 4.8G 4.6G 52% / > /dev/sda3 100M 4.5M 96M 5% /boot/efi > /dev/sda10 4.9G 214M 4.4G 5% /home > /dev/sda4 20G 34M 19G 1% /opt > none 997M 0 997M 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda9 4.9G 33M 4.6G 1% /tmp > /dev/sda6 15G 2.0G 12G 15% /usr > /dev...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107210 Bug ID: 107210 Summary: Segment Fault while opening thunderbitf windows Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

The standard controller that has been recommended in the past is the AOC-SAT2-MV8 - an 8 port with a marvel chipset. There have been several mentions of LSI based controllers on the mailing lists and I''m wondering about them. One obvious difference is that the Marvel contoller is PCI-X and the LSI controllers are PCI-E. Supermicro have several LSI controllers. AOC-USASLP-L8i with the

...088424 s, 190 MB/s Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on 192.168.192.5:/test 291M 80M 211M 28% /mnt/gluster1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 16777216 bytes (17 MB) copied, 0.0876373 s, 191 MB/s Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on 192.168.192.5:/test 291M 96M 195M 33% /mnt/gluster1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 16777216 bytes (17 MB) copied, 0.0890243 s, 188 MB/s Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on 192.168.192.5:/test 291M 112M 179M 39% /mnt/gluster1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 16777216 bytes (17 MB) copied, 0.0853196 s, 19...

First off - let me say I am not an administrator.?? I need to know?if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition.? When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size.? it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and

Hi all, I am running the current xen-unstable and had the following error message when trying to create domain1. # ./xenctl script -f/etc/xen-mynewdom Domain defaults: name XenoLinux size 98304 vifs 1 domainImage /boot/xenolinux.gz domainInitRD null rootDevice /dev/hda5 rootArgs rw usrDevice null NWIP

Hello, everyone! I picked up R several months ago and have adopted it as my choice for statistical programming. Coming from a Java background, I can honestly say that R is not only free, it is better tha S-plus: the lexical scope in R makes it very simple to simulate Java's object model. For this, I encourage everyone to read the artcle: Robert Gentleman and Ross Ihaka (2000) "Lexical