search for: 96607840kb

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "96607840kb".

2018 Nov 03
5
reading old dump backups from 2009
...3032 kB/s, finished in 8:38 ????? . ????? . ????? . ?DUMP: 100.00% done at 4075 kB/s, finished in 0:00 ? DUMP: Closing u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump ? DUMP: Volume 1 completed at: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009 ? DUMP: Volume 1 took 6:35:04 ? DUMP: Volume 1 transfer rate: 2146 kB/s ? DUMP: Volume 1 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1 ? DUMP: 96607840 blocks (94343.59MB) on 1 volume(s) ? DUMP: finished in 23704 seconds, throughput 4075 kBytes/sec ? DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009 ? DUMP: Date this dump completed:? Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009 ? DUMP: Average...
2018 Nov 03
0
reading old dump backups from 2009
...at compression level 2 (bzlib) > DUMP: finished in 23704 seconds, throughput 4075 kBytes/sec > DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009 > DUMP: Date this dump completed: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009 > DUMP: Average transfer rate: 2146 kB/s > DUMP: Wrote 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1 > DUMP: DUMP IS DONE The dump is compressed. What was the command line you used to create the dump file? Have you tried using restore tzvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump > > Have there been any changes to the format of dump files and if so,...