Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "965035".
Did you mean:
965.35
2018 May 25
1
first class types
Ah, that's why Clang is obsessively pushing them into return by reference?
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:29 PM, whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org>
wrote:
> On 2018-05-25 00:39, Alexandre Isoard via llvm-dev wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see here: https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#ret-instruction
>>
>> That the return instruction must only return