search for: 9634

I am running R version as follows under Windows XP. platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 2 minor 5.0 year 2007

...output matrix from my mst command, however this is not terribly map-like, so I'm looking for a better display that can be embedded in a document. Any assistance gratefully received! Fiona. > Fiona Wade > Project Manager > MARA > F&A > Telstra Corporation Limited > Tel: 03 9634 5674 > Fax: 03 9634 2874 > Email: fiona.m.wade at team.telstra.com > > The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use of, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If y...

...ansfer {"none";}; > > > > Can someone please advise on how to disable 'DNS Zone Transfers' when > > using Bind9 DLZ with Samba. > > > > Thank you > > Kind regards > > > We have a bug for this: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 > > Which has a gitlab page: > https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/169 > > It looks like there is a fix there, but it looks like your Bind9 version > (which I take it is actually 9.9.4) will be too old. > > Rowland > > > > -- > To unsubscribe fr...

...Mean >= 1 & InternalMean < 2) Intresult = .85 if (InternalMean >= 2 & InternalMean < 4) Intresult = .70 ... if (InternalMean >= 9) Intresult = .0 Thanks in advance Glen Jones Value Analyst Industry Framework Governance Telstra Corporation Limited > Tel: (03) 9634 7280 email: glen.jones@team.telstra.com > The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, any use of, interference with, > disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. > If you have received this m...

Hello! Own Samba 4.4.5 with BIND 9.9.7, and realized (in older Samba versions also) that the DNS zone transfer works when anyone makes the request, the update is correct only DC can. This behavior seems "wrong", right? Its block I (tried a few things, but without success). Thank you

I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I come across the following: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are 2 years old?

...secret=<SECRET> host=sip.broadvoice.com fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com outboundproxy=sip.broadvoice.com insecure=very dtmfmode=inband dtmf=inband canreinvite=no context=incoming I receive the following error through asterisk when attempting a call: Apr 8 13:08:43 WARNING[17425]: chan_sip.c:9634 handle_response_invite: Forbidden - wrong password on authentication for INVITE to '"My Name" <sip:26@192.168.1.61>;tag=as23aa39db' Now, we can receive incoming calls perfectly fine, but I just can't wrap my head around what is wrong with the outgoing. I figure it...

Hello All, I hope someone might be able to assist me. Env: RHEL 7 Samba 4.10 Bind9 DLZ 9.4 I have tried everything to disable 'DNS Zone Transfers' when using Bind9 DLZ with Samba ADDC. I'm using below line , and I have tried different acl's as well, but nothing seems to work. allow-transfer {"none";}; Can someone please advise on how to disable 'DNS Zone

...amba 4.4.5 with BIND 9.9.7, and realized (in older Samba versions > > also) that the DNS zone transfer works when anyone makes the request, > > the update is correct only DC can. > > This behavior seems "wrong", right? > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 > > The internal DNS disallows zone transfers and BIND_DLZ permits. That's a > bug of course and an inconsistent behaviour. However, it's still unfixed. > > > Regards, > Marc > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instr...

Hi, This is my first Samba4 installation, so I'm a rookie in this topic. Sorry if I ask trivial questions. I have a virtual server with 2 network interfaces. The first one is in the server network, the second one is in the storage network (the samba shares are on an NFS volume). If I start the sernet-samba-ad service with both interfaces are up I got both IPs in the A record. [root at samba

...e asterisk 1.0.9 with an Eicon Diva 4bri and chan_capi-cm-0.6. I have 2 NTBAs (one with did and one without). When using the one without did, i am able to place outgoing and incoming calls. When i use the NTBAs with did i have a layer 2 error. Anyone an idea? -- Executing Dial("SIP/2004-9634", "CAPI/g1/43XXXXXX") in new stack > data = g1/43XXXXXX > parsed dialstring: 'g1' '43XXXXXX' '' > capi request group = 2 > parsed dialstring: 'g1' '43XXXXXX' '' == EICON: Call CAPI/EICON/43XXXXX...

...its information from my samba-ad dns server? Or is my only option at the moment to use bind-dlz with bind on my samba-dc? This page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration says zone transfers is unimplemented but one of the links on there https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 I see >Julien ROPÉ 2018-11-27 10:04:49 UTC > >Hi, > >One of my clients asked for a fix on this issue. Seeing the comments on this thread, I implemented the suggested modification : add an option in smb.conf to control the list of authorized clients for a DNS zone transfer. > &gt...

This patch adds the seatbelts which _only_ kill parent sshd procs... -RMallory (eg: when you ssh into a machine and pkgadd the new openssh, it will not kill your current (or anyone else's sshd session) onanother_note: the buildpkg.sh could use some exec_prefix functionality... to deal with ./configure --prefix= --exec_prefix=/usr *** bak/opensshd.in Fri Oct 19 13:36:24 2001 ---

Hi, Thanks for your help. Is like magic, after a lot of tests without results and just now the file is finally created and works as expected... Maybe it need more time. Sorry for ask here, but I've asked because in this server bind is only a bridge between the Samba 4 and the other server and then i did not know if maybe i did something wrong or samba need any special configuration. Now i see

...: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration >> >> I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. >> >> To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I >> come across the following: >> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 >> >> Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are >> 2 years old? > > So I tried it anyway: > > In my main DNS server: > > zone "home.htt" { > type slave; > file "slaves/bak...

Hi, (my first post to the list) I'm in the process of testing Dovecot to see whether it meets our needs to replace our current Courier setup which serves well over 100.000 mailboxes (pop3 and imap: mysql with NFS) So far dovecot seems pretty straight forward; however I ran into a couple of things that I'm curious about. 1. What's the deal with

...t;>>> >>>> I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. >>>> >>>> To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I >>>> come across the following: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 >>>> >>>> Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are >>>> 2 years old? >>> >>> So I tried it anyway: >>> >>> In my main DNS server: >>> >>> zone "home.htt" { >&...

Hi everybody, I was reading wiki's page about Bind configuration: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_basic_BIND_installation At named.conf section, there is these lines : allow-transfer { # this config is for a single master DNS server none; }; If I have multiple DC's with bind installed, do i have to replace < none > with all my other DC's IP ?

...h should act the same way and disable zone transfers for BIND9_DLZ, too. Until yet, no one submitted a patch, but if you setup something that relies on that behaviour, you maybe get a surprise one day after updating. :-) For more about that discussion, see https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Regards, Marc

Hi, I''m getting a new server to run a rails app and was asked whether I wanted a 64 bit or 32 bit machine. It will be running Fedora Core 3. Needless to say I''m thinking 64 bit, but was concerned there might be stability issues with Fedora and Rails on one or the other (or both?). Any thoughts or relevant experiences? larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML