Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "963179".
Did you mean:
963177
2018 Feb 15
3
[RFC] [lld] Replace use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' with standard library
Hello all,
Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and
Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual
Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each'
can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976
After having some difficulty clarifying this