search for: 962959

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "962959".

Did you mean: 92959
2018 Feb 01
2
llvm.memcpy for struct copy
On 2/1/2018 2:03 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > In contrast, the padding between fields in non-packed structs > disappears as soon as SROA runs. This can lead to violations of C > semantics, where padding fields should not change (because C defines > bitwise comparisons on structs using memcmp). This can lead to subtly > different behaviour in C code depending on the