search for: 96174ed0

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "96174ed0".

Did you mean: 961740
2009 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal to disable some of DAG combine optimizations
...___ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090323/96174ed0/attachment.html>
2009 Mar 23
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal to disable some of DAG combine optimizations
I can't think of any workaround? this optimization eliminates so much information that if we want to retrieve back, it will take a lot of processing and may not necessarily be able to retrieve the lost information for all cases. Besides, why does the generic part of llvm have to force an optimization that is counter productive to some targets? If there are other phases that do the same