Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "960e783e".
Did you mean:
960783
2009 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
...VMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: anders-patch.txt
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090827/960e783e/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
2009 Aug 27
3
[LLVMdev] alias analysis
Hello,
Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers precisely? I
ran it and it looks like it says every function points points to the
universal set. Is this what I should expect?
Max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090826/ff8d6c78/attachment.html>
2009 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers
> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points
> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect?
Hi Max,
I don't know the answer offhand but please keep in mind that the
current andersen's pass has many