Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "960975".
Did you mean:
960973
2017 Nov 08
2
[RFC] lld: Dropping TLS relaxations in favor of TLSDESC
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:
>
> >> So I am strongly against removing either non TLSDESC support of support
> >> for the relaxations.
> >>
> >
> > It's still pretty arguable. By default, compilers use General Dynamic
> model