Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "960189".
Did you mean:
960185
2017 May 03
3
Should it be legal for two functions to have the same !dbg attachment?
I just wrote an IR Verifier check that catches the following situation:
; RUN: not llvm-as %s -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
define void @f1() !dbg !4 {
unreachable
}
; CHECK: DISubprogram attached to more than one function
define void @f2() !dbg !4 {
unreachable
}
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
!1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2)
!2