search for: 95fc8e35

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "95fc8e35".

2010 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
> Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. Eugene On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury Pouly <amaury.pouly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm > code when I realize
2010 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
Hello, I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm code when I realize something terrible. The scheduling code builds a graph made up of SUnit * nodes (see ScheduleDAG*.{cpp,h}). These SUnits nodes are allocated via a std::vector< SUnit >. This isn't a problem as long as the pointers are taken after the vector is fully filled and the vector never changes
2010 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
...ist > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100808/95fc8e35/attachment.html>