search for: 95e6db21e7e1

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "95e6db21e7e1".

2019 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 08/13] vsock: move vsock_insert_unbound() in the vsock_create()
...ck_insert_unbound() at the end of vsock_create(). Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index dee69d7ee148..95e6db21e7e1 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -634,9 +634,6 @@ struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net, return NULL; } - if (sock) - vsock_insert_unbound(vsk); - return sk; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vsock_create); @@ -1875,6 +1872,8 @@ static const struct proto...
2019 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 10/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
...ddr_vm *dst); void vsock_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk); void vsock_for_each_connected_socket(void (*fn)(struct sock *sk)); +int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk); /**** TAP ****/ diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 95e6db21e7e1..c52203fe52c4 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -130,7 +130,12 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = { #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE (1024 * 256) #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MIN_SIZE 128 -static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single; +/* Tr...
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using