search for: 95de5a69

...I haven't heard any new suggestions. I think any such design would probably be write-only, and revolve around sharing the bitcode auto-upgrade logic. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150730/95de5a69/attachment.html>

I think the idea of having a (hopefully not too) fluid C API that can encompass everything people want to be able to do in the language of their choice and calls into LLVM to do work sounds like a great idea. I think it would be useful to expand the number of people who are able to do research and development with LLVM without having to reinvent LLVM. That said, this is directly at odds with our