Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "957069".
Did you mean:
57069
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but enabling that did not make much effect).
To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small files for obvious reasons:
1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks
2. Afaik, gluster does not support read/write delegations the same way NFS does.
3. Glusterfs is