search for: 957,16

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "957,16".

Did you mean: 457,16
2019 Sep 06
1
[PATCH 1/2] Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address"
...gt;mmu_lock); > - > - return 0; > - > -err_gup: > - kfree(pages); > -err_pages: > - kfree(map); > -err: > - spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock); > - return err; > -} > -#endif > - > void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev) > { > int i; > @@ -957,16 +684,8 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev) > kthread_stop(dev->worker); > dev->worker = NULL; > } > - if (dev->mm) { > -#if VHOST_ARCH_CAN_ACCEL_UACCESS > - mmu_notifier_unregister(&dev->mmu_notifier, dev->mm); > -#endif > + if (de...
2019 Sep 05
0
[PATCH 1/2] Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address"
...->worker so we are serialized with all - * readers. - */ - spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock); - - return 0; - -err_gup: - kfree(pages); -err_pages: - kfree(map); -err: - spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock); - return err; -} -#endif - void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev) { int i; @@ -957,16 +684,8 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev) kthread_stop(dev->worker); dev->worker = NULL; } - if (dev->mm) { -#if VHOST_ARCH_CAN_ACCEL_UACCESS - mmu_notifier_unregister(&dev->mmu_notifier, dev->mm); -#endif + if (dev->mm) mmput(dev->mm); - } -#if...
2019 Sep 05
8
[PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
Hi: Per request from Michael and Jason, the metadata accelreation is reverted in this version and rework in next version. Please review. Thanks Jason Wang (2): Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address" vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through kernel virtual address drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2019 Sep 05
8
[PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
Hi: Per request from Michael and Jason, the metadata accelreation is reverted in this version and rework in next version. Please review. Thanks Jason Wang (2): Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address" vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through kernel virtual address drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid