Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "956f5b49".
2012 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] Alias Analysis accuracy
On 9/21/2012 4:35 PM, Welson Sun wrote:
> Dear LLVM,
>
> I would like to understand how to improve the LLVM alias analysis
> accuracy. I am currently using llvmgcc 2.9 and llvm 3.0. Here is the C code:
>
> void foo(int a[SIZE], int b[SIZE], int c[SIZE])
> {
> for(int i=0; i<SIZE; i++)
> c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
> }
This is equivalent to
void foo(int *a, int *b,
2012 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] Alias Analysis accuracy
...ilman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>
--
Welson
Phone: (408) 418-8385
Email: welson.sun at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120921/956f5b49/attachment.html>
2012 Sep 21
3
[LLVMdev] Alias Analysis accuracy
Dear LLVM,
I would like to understand how to improve the LLVM alias analysis accuracy.
I am currently using llvmgcc 2.9 and llvm 3.0. Here is the C code:
void foo(int a[SIZE], int b[SIZE], int c[SIZE])
{
for(int i=0; i<SIZE; i++)
c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
Here is the IR:
target datalayout =