search for: 956f

...--------------------------------------------------------- /lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1189: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=TDS COMMON\0ADEL:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com, conficts with CN=SUDIKSHA VILAS MHATRE\0ADEL:0b07eb12-99bd-4688-956f-55003920aa8f,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com in @INDEX:OBJECTSID::AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAAu/PHIwO8muhtdxC5k7cDAA== ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1189: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=TDS COMMON\0ADEL:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897\0ACNF:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897,CN...

Hi, I am trying to make Samba 4 as additional DC to a Domain Hosted in Windows Server 2003 R2. Is it possible? Or do we have to first migrate to Windows Server 2008 R2 and then to Samba? samba-toll domain join command comes upto Domain Provision and it reports OK. However when the replication starts it fails. Error thrown is: "Failed to bind to uuid

...-------------------------------------------------------- > /lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1189: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=TDS COMMON\0ADEL:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com, conficts with CN=SUDIKSHA VILAS MHATRE\0ADEL:0b07eb12-99bd-4688-956f-55003920aa8f,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com in @INDEX:OBJECTSID::AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAAu/PHIwO8muhtdxC5k7cDAA== > > Is this error something to do with Windows Domain Controller? I have a patch for this, developed for a customer who hit the same thing, remind me if you don't get it...

...---------------------------------------------------- >> /lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1189: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=TDS COMMON\0ADEL:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com, conficts with CN=SUDIKSHA VILAS MHATRE\0ADEL:0b07eb12-99bd-4688-956f-55003920aa8f,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com in @INDEX:OBJECTSID::AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAAu/PHIwO8muhtdxC5k7cDAA== >> >> Is this error something to do with Windows Domain Controller? > I have a patch for this, developed for a customer who hit the same > thing, remind me if you d...

...---------------------------------------------------- >> /lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1189: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=TDS COMMON\0ADEL:dae6fa1e-21c5-4837-9d8c-a9356794c897,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com, conficts with CN=SUDIKSHA VILAS MHATRE\0ADEL:0b07eb12-99bd-4688-956f-55003920aa8f,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=corp,DC=dtdc,DC=com in @INDEX:OBJECTSID::AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAAu/PHIwO8muhtdxC5k7cDAA== >> >> Is this error something to do with Windows Domain Controller? > I have a patch for this, developed for a customer who hit the same > thing, remind me if you d...

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info <volname> 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > On a side note, try recently released health

On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all the three machines. On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster > Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next

...heal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed data selfheal on 86443885-a847-4ed2-8c4c-ffce198538d9. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:27.071586] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:52:__afr_selfheal_metadata_do] 0-home-replicate-0: performing metadata selfheal on d93f5dfa-6829-45b9-9a79-f5bf5956f6b0 [2017-10-25 10:40:27.074418] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:1327:afr_log_selfheal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed metadata selfheal on d93f5dfa-6829-45b9-9a79-f5bf5956f6b0. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:27.093772] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:1327:afr_log_selfh...