Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9567092f".
Did you mean:
567092
2012 Dec 02
1
[LLVMdev] Use rand_r() instead of non-reentrant thread-unsafe rand() in GetRandomNumber()
...-
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Justin Holewinski
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121201/9567092f/attachment.html>
2012 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] Use rand_r() instead of non-reentrant thread-unsafe rand() in GetRandomNumber()
Correcting my patch, reg. __thread stuff I'm not very familiar with.
- D.
2012/12/1 Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org>
> Agreed, done.
>
> One thing I'm not sure about is this statement in docs:
>
> POSIX.1-2008 marks *rand_r*() as obsolete.
>
> - And... what is the replacement?
>
>
> 2012/12/1 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at
2012 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] Use rand_r() instead of non-reentrant thread-unsafe rand() in GetRandomNumber()
Agreed, done.
One thing I'm not sure about is this statement in docs:
POSIX.1-2008 marks *rand_r*() as obsolete.
- And... what is the replacement?
2012/12/1 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
> If we're keeping the state locally now, perhaps we should store it in a
> per-thread variable. I know rand() isn't thread safe to begin with, but it
> seems