Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "94fee31f".
2013 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Using CMake/Ninja on buildbots
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 21:41:06 Renato Golin wrote:
Hi all,
A discussion was being carried on llvmcommits about the extra time for
cleaning and re-building objects that didn't need to be built on buildbots.
Since they just update the repository, builds could be a lot faster if we let
the objects in place. Even faster if we used Ninja with CMake. Is there a
crucial reason why
2013 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Using CMake/Ninja on buildbots
...rategy, though. Galina may
know of a way of doing this... But I'm ok with just running { warm+ninja }
for the foreseeable future...
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130206/94fee31f/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 06
5
[LLVMdev] Using CMake/Ninja on buildbots
Hi all,
A discussion was being carried on llvmcommits about the extra time for
cleaning and re-building objects that didn't need to be built on buildbots.
Since they just update the repository, builds could be a lot faster if we
let the objects in place. Even faster if we used Ninja with CMake. Is there
a crucial reason why we're still using autoconf for all builds?
Some of us