search for: 944b

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "944b".

Did you mean: 944
2011 Mar 02
5
installing xen on a vmware work station
Hi, I decided to test new Xen pv-ops Dom0 kernel. I have a 64 bit VT machine there in it Vmware work station installed Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit and then apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev xserver-xorg-dev mercurial gitk build-essential libncurses5-dev uuid-dev gawk gettext texinfo bcc libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper iasl texinfo bridge-utils bison flex apt-get build-dep xen-3.3 cd /usr/src
2017 Aug 21
0
AutoFS
...; governsID: 1.3.6.1.1.1.2.17 > mustContain: automountKey > mustContain: automountInformation > mayContain: description > rDNAttID: cn > showInAdvancedViewOnly: TRUE > *objectClassCategory: 1* > lDAPDisplayName: automount > name: automount > objectGUID: 4ce936a8-8791-4b74-944b-f8e66748724d > schemaIDGUID: 32dda32c-859a-c19a-f0da-de84c2c8fd47 > objectCategory: > CN=Class-Schema,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=corp,DC=lncsa,DC > =com > defaultObjectCategory: > CN=automount,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=corp,DC=lncs > a,DC=com > uSNChanged: 10605...
2012 Jun 08
0
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > 112B BB#1: derived from LLVM BB %for.body, ADDRESS TAKEN > Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0 BB#1 > %vreg12<def> = PHI %vreg13, <BB#1>, %vreg11, <BB#0>;CTRRC8:%vreg12,%vreg13,%vreg11 > %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg12<kill>; CTRRC8:%vreg13,%vreg12 > %vreg13<def> = BDNZ8 %vreg13,
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
...icalRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineBasicBlock::iterator, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, llvm::LiveInt erval&): Assertion `!isAllocatable(interval.reg) && "Physregs shouldn't be live out!"' failed. in this case the loop is quite simple: 944B BB#8: derived from LLVM BB %for.inc6, ADDRESS TAKEN Live Ins: %CTR8 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#8 BB#3 960B BDNZ8 <BB#8>, %CTR8<imp-def>, %CTR8<imp-use,kill> Successors according to CFG: BB#8 BB#10 the preheader is: 240B...
2017 Aug 18
4
AutoFS
Hi all, I would like to use AutoFS on Samba but I encounter difficulties with ldap entries. I have already add the Automount Schema from the Wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions) but I can't add "auto_master" and the folowings leaf. I tried : dn: automountmapname=auto_master,dc=MYDOMAIN automountMapName: auto_master objectClass: automountMap
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
Hello again, I am trying to implement an optimization pass for PowerPC such that simple loops use the special "counter register" (CTR) to track the induction variable. This is helpful because, in addition to reducing register pressure, there is a combined decrement-compare-and-branch instruction BZND (there are also other related instructions). I started this process by converting the
2012 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...g128:%vreg6 register: %vreg31 +[896r,912r:0) 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 register: %vreg32 +[912r,944r:0) 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 register: %vreg34 +[928r,960r:0) 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32 register: %vreg35 +[944r,976r:0) 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34 register: %vreg35 replace range with [944r,960r:1) RESULT: [944r,960r:1)[960r,976r:0)  0 at 960r...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...912r:0) > 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; > R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 > register: %vreg32 +[912r,944r:0) > 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 > R600_Reg128:%vreg6 > register: %vreg34 +[928r,960r:0) > 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32 > register: %vreg35 +[944r,976r:0) > 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 > R600_Reg32:%vreg34 > register: %vreg35 replace range with [944r,960r:1) RESULT: > [944r,960r...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...OOP BODY > 896B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 > 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 > 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 > 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32 > 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34 > 976B%vreg36<def> = COPY %vreg35<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg36,%vreg35 > 992B%vreg36:sel_z<def> = COPY...
2012 Oct 24
3
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...;, pred:%noreg // LOOP BODY 896B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34 976B%vreg36<def> = COPY %vreg35<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg36,%vreg35 992B%vreg36:sel_z<def> = COPY %vreg5<kill...