Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "944b".
Did you mean:
944
2011 Mar 02
5
installing xen on a vmware work station
Hi,
I decided to test new Xen pv-ops Dom0 kernel.
I have a 64 bit VT machine there in it Vmware work station installed
Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit
and then
apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev xserver-xorg-dev mercurial gitk
build-essential libncurses5-dev uuid-dev gawk gettext texinfo bcc
libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper iasl texinfo bridge-utils bison
flex apt-get build-dep xen-3.3
cd /usr/src
2017 Aug 21
0
AutoFS
...; governsID: 1.3.6.1.1.1.2.17
> mustContain: automountKey
> mustContain: automountInformation
> mayContain: description
> rDNAttID: cn
> showInAdvancedViewOnly: TRUE
> *objectClassCategory: 1*
> lDAPDisplayName: automount
> name: automount
> objectGUID: 4ce936a8-8791-4b74-944b-f8e66748724d
> schemaIDGUID: 32dda32c-859a-c19a-f0da-de84c2c8fd47
> objectCategory:
> CN=Class-Schema,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=corp,DC=lncsa,DC
> =com
> defaultObjectCategory:
> CN=automount,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=corp,DC=lncs
> a,DC=com
> uSNChanged: 10605...
2012 Jun 08
0
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> 112B BB#1: derived from LLVM BB %for.body, ADDRESS TAKEN
> Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0 BB#1
> %vreg12<def> = PHI %vreg13, <BB#1>, %vreg11, <BB#0>;CTRRC8:%vreg12,%vreg13,%vreg11
> %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg12<kill>; CTRRC8:%vreg13,%vreg12
> %vreg13<def> = BDNZ8 %vreg13,
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
...icalRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock::iterator, llvm::SlotIndex,
llvm::MachineOperand&, llvm::LiveInt erval&): Assertion
`!isAllocatable(interval.reg) && "Physregs shouldn't be live out!"'
failed.
in this case the loop is quite simple:
944B BB#8: derived from LLVM BB %for.inc6, ADDRESS TAKEN
Live Ins: %CTR8
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#8 BB#3
960B BDNZ8 <BB#8>, %CTR8<imp-def>, %CTR8<imp-use,kill>
Successors according to CFG: BB#8 BB#10
the preheader is:
240B...
2017 Aug 18
4
AutoFS
Hi all,
I would like to use AutoFS on Samba but I encounter difficulties with
ldap entries.
I have already add the Automount Schema from the Wiki
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions) but I
can't add "auto_master" and the folowings leaf.
I tried :
dn: automountmapname=auto_master,dc=MYDOMAIN
automountMapName: auto_master
objectClass: automountMap
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes
Hello again,
I am trying to implement an optimization pass for PowerPC such that
simple loops use the special "counter register" (CTR) to track the
induction variable. This is helpful because, in addition to reducing
register pressure, there is a combined decrement-compare-and-branch
instruction BZND (there are also other related instructions).
I started this process by converting the
2012 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...g128:%vreg6
register: %vreg31 +[896r,912r:0)
912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31
register: %vreg32 +[912r,944r:0)
928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6
register: %vreg34 +[928r,960r:0)
944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32
register: %vreg35 +[944r,976r:0)
960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34
register: %vreg35 replace range with [944r,960r:1) RESULT: [944r,960r:1)[960r,976r:0) 0 at 960r...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...912r:0)
> 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>;
> R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31
> register: %vreg32 +[912r,944r:0)
> 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34
> R600_Reg128:%vreg6
> register: %vreg34 +[928r,960r:0)
> 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32
> register: %vreg35 +[944r,976r:0)
> 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35
> R600_Reg32:%vreg34
> register: %vreg35 replace range with [944r,960r:1) RESULT:
> [944r,960r...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...OOP BODY
> 896B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6
> 912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31
> 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6
> 944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32
> 960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34
> 976B%vreg36<def> = COPY %vreg35<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg36,%vreg35
> 992B%vreg36:sel_z<def> = COPY...
2012 Oct 24
3
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...;, pred:%noreg
// LOOP BODY
896B%vreg31<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_x; R600_Reg32:%vreg31 R600_Reg128:%vreg6
912B%vreg32:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg31<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg32 R600_Reg32:%vreg31
928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6
944B%vreg35<def> = COPY %vreg32<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35,%vreg32
960B%vreg35:sel_y<def> = COPY %vreg34<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg35 R600_Reg32:%vreg34
976B%vreg36<def> = COPY %vreg35<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg36,%vreg35
992B%vreg36:sel_z<def> = COPY %vreg5<kill...