Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "944a".
Did you mean:
944
2019 Mar 27
3
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...WOWDSDDTSW;;;DA)(A;;RPWP
> CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC;
> ;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1
> 1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O
> A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1
> -aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA
> ;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768
> -00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A...
2015 Dec 29
3
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Good afternoon!
Had a samba 4 with a Windows 2003 network that is not over, I went up to
the level of my domain / forest
Forest level function: (Windows) 2008 R2
Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2
Lowest function level of the DC (Windows) 2008 R2
But it seems that Samba is not with all attributes of a Windows 2008.
Even try to join another Samba error appears
ERROR (ldb): uncaught
2019 Mar 26
0
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;DA)(A;;RPWP
CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC;
;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1
1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O
A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1
-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA
;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768
-00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A
U)(OA...
2019 Mar 26
2
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
Hi Tim and Rowland, thanks for Your support!
I was thinking about e.g. Python 2.7.15 compatibility (as newer Samba
versions require Python3), but You are right, here in DB can be problem
- first Samba AD DC was created by migrating Samba3 NT4 domain to Samba4
AD cca week ago (using 'samba-tool domain classicupgrade ...', according
to Samba Wiki):
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:14:02 +1300
Tim
2015 Dec 29
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
...dEncryptionTypes
>> attributeId: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1963
>> attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.9
>> omSyntax: 2
>> isSingleValued: TRUE
>> schemaIdGuid: 20119867-1d04-4ab7-9371-cfc3d5df0afd
>> systemOnly: FALSE
>> searchFlags: 0
>> attributeSecurityGuid: 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1
>> systemFlags: FLAG_SCHEMA_BASE_OBJECT
>> schemaFlagsEx: FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL
>>
>> And your DC objects should have this:
>>
>> msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes: 31
>>
>> Was the original DC a Samba 4 DC ?
>>
>> Rowla...
2018 Nov 01
1
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
...1: SEC_ACE_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT
0: SEC_ACE_INHERITED_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT
type : union security_ace_object_type(case 1)
type : 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1
inherited_type : union security_ace_object_inherited_type(case 0)
trustee : S-1-5-10
aces: struct security_ace
type : SEC_ACE_TYPE_AC...
2023 Feb 23
1
Big problems after update to 9.6
...e brick log:
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717721 +0000] I [addr.c:54:compare_addr_and_update]
0-/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0: allowed = "*", received addr =
"10.20.20.11"
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717817 +0000] I [login.c:110:gf_auth] 0-auth/login:
allowed user names: a26c7de4-1236-4e0a-944a-cb82de7f7f0e
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717840 +0000] I [MSGID: 115029]
[server-handshake.c:561:server_setvolume] 0-gvol0-server: accepted client
from
CTX_ID:46b23c19-5114-4a20-9306-9ea6faf02d51-GRAPH_ID:0-PID:35568-HOST:br.m5voip.com-PC_NAME:gvol0-client-0-RECON_NO:-0
(version: 9.1) with subvol /nodirec...
2018 Nov 01
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to
the experts :)
I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
2023 Feb 24
1
Big problems after update to 9.6
...e brick log:
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717721 +0000] I [addr.c:54:compare_addr_and_update] 0-/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0: allowed = "*", received addr = "10.20.20.11"
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717817 +0000] I [login.c:110:gf_auth] 0-auth/login: allowed user names: a26c7de4-1236-4e0a-944a-cb82de7f7f0e
[2023-02-23 20:22:56.717840 +0000] I [MSGID: 115029] [server-handshake.c:561:server_setvolume] 0-gvol0-server: accepted client from CTX_ID:46b23c19-5114-4a20-9306-9ea6faf02d51-GRAPH_ID:0-PID:35568-HOST:br.m5voip.com-PC_NAME:gvol0-client-0-RECON_NO:-0 (version: 9.1) with subvol /nodirec...
2007 Oct 22
1
unsubscribe
...--------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:47:25 -0500
From: Luke Kanies <luke at madstop.com>
Subject: Re: [Puppet-users] external nodes
To: Puppet User Discussion <puppet-users at madstop.com>
Message-ID: <4EF7773A-42D8-4646-944A-2F7E6C331C1B at madstop.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Chris MacLeod wrote:
> the example below works really well but I can''t express it via my
> external nodes, I have to bury it in a class (or module). I...
2011 Aug 17
3
Bug#638152: Error: Device 51712 (vbd) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
Package: xen-utils-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: normal
This issue is similar to
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2011-March/003217.html
but since I was not able to find a bug report I'm reporting this now.
Steps to reproduce:
1) cat << EOF > config
name = 'squeeze64'
vcpus = '4'
memory = '512'
disk = [