search for: 944a

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "944a".

Did you mean: 944
2019 Mar 27
3
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...WOWDSDDTSW;;;DA)(A;;RPWP > CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC; > ;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1 > 1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O > A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1 > -aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA > ;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768 > -00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A...
2015 Dec 29
3
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Good afternoon! Had a samba 4 with a Windows 2003 network that is not over, I went up to the level of my domain / forest Forest level function: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of the DC (Windows) 2008 R2 But it seems that Samba is not with all attributes of a Windows 2008. Even try to join another Samba error appears ERROR (ldb): uncaught
2019 Mar 26
0
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;DA)(A;;RPWP CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC; ;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1 1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1 -aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA ;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768 -00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A U)(OA...
2019 Mar 26
2
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
Hi Tim and Rowland, thanks for Your support! I was thinking about e.g. Python 2.7.15 compatibility (as newer Samba versions require Python3), but You are right, here in DB can be problem - first Samba AD DC was created by migrating Samba3 NT4 domain to Samba4 AD cca week ago (using 'samba-tool domain classicupgrade ...', according to Samba Wiki): On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:14:02 +1300 Tim
2015 Dec 29
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
...dEncryptionTypes >> attributeId: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1963 >> attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.9 >> omSyntax: 2 >> isSingleValued: TRUE >> schemaIdGuid: 20119867-1d04-4ab7-9371-cfc3d5df0afd >> systemOnly: FALSE >> searchFlags: 0 >> attributeSecurityGuid: 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1 >> systemFlags: FLAG_SCHEMA_BASE_OBJECT >> schemaFlagsEx: FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL >> >> And your DC objects should have this: >> >> msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes: 31 >> >> Was the original DC a Samba 4 DC ? >> >> Rowla...
2018 Nov 01
1
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
...1: SEC_ACE_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT 0: SEC_ACE_INHERITED_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT type : union security_ace_object_type(case 1) type : 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1 inherited_type : union security_ace_object_inherited_type(case 0) trustee : S-1-5-10 aces: struct security_ace type : SEC_ACE_TYPE_AC...
2023 Feb 23
1
Big problems after update to 9.6
...e brick log: [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717721 +0000] I [addr.c:54:compare_addr_and_update] 0-/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0: allowed = "*", received addr = "10.20.20.11" [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717817 +0000] I [login.c:110:gf_auth] 0-auth/login: allowed user names: a26c7de4-1236-4e0a-944a-cb82de7f7f0e [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717840 +0000] I [MSGID: 115029] [server-handshake.c:561:server_setvolume] 0-gvol0-server: accepted client from CTX_ID:46b23c19-5114-4a20-9306-9ea6faf02d51-GRAPH_ID:0-PID:35568-HOST:br.m5voip.com-PC_NAME:gvol0-client-0-RECON_NO:-0 (version: 9.1) with subvol /nodirec...
2018 Nov 01
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to the experts :) I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below. ;; ANSWER SECTION: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
2023 Feb 24
1
Big problems after update to 9.6
...e brick log: [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717721 +0000] I [addr.c:54:compare_addr_and_update] 0-/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0: allowed = "*", received addr = "10.20.20.11" [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717817 +0000] I [login.c:110:gf_auth] 0-auth/login: allowed user names: a26c7de4-1236-4e0a-944a-cb82de7f7f0e [2023-02-23 20:22:56.717840 +0000] I [MSGID: 115029] [server-handshake.c:561:server_setvolume] 0-gvol0-server: accepted client from CTX_ID:46b23c19-5114-4a20-9306-9ea6faf02d51-GRAPH_ID:0-PID:35568-HOST:br.m5voip.com-PC_NAME:gvol0-client-0-RECON_NO:-0 (version: 9.1) with subvol /nodirec...
2007 Oct 22
1
unsubscribe
...-------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:47:25 -0500 From: Luke Kanies <luke at madstop.com> Subject: Re: [Puppet-users] external nodes To: Puppet User Discussion <puppet-users at madstop.com> Message-ID: <4EF7773A-42D8-4646-944A-2F7E6C331C1B at madstop.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Chris MacLeod wrote: > the example below works really well but I can''t express it via my > external nodes, I have to bury it in a class (or module). I...
2011 Aug 17
3
Bug#638152: Error: Device 51712 (vbd) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: normal This issue is similar to http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2011-March/003217.html but since I was not able to find a bug report I'm reporting this now. Steps to reproduce: 1) cat << EOF > config name = 'squeeze64' vcpus = '4' memory = '512' disk = [