search for: 9434748a

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9434748a".

2015 Aug 31
2
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Having it off by default makes sense to me. We just need an easy way of > enabling it from the clang driver. > Not sure I follow? Generally LTO inputs are going to be "user provided" (in the sense that they're not produced immediately prior by the same process - or you'd have
2015 Aug 31
4
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
...low before flipping it off. Maybe the verifier is running multiple times, instead of after deserialization. We shouldn't need that in release builds. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150831/9434748a/attachment.html>