Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "942296".
2018 Nov 30
4
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
On 2018/11/21 ??6:03, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> Add types and macros for packed ring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 +++
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
2018 Nov 30
4
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
On 2018/11/21 ??6:03, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> Add types and macros for packed ring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 +++
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...This looks inconsistent to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > >
> > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> >
> > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> >
> > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT 2
> > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT (1ul...
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...This looks inconsistent to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > >
> > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> >
> > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> >
> > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT 2
> > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT (1ul...
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...ason for using shifts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > > > >
> > > > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> > > >
> > > > #define VRING_DESC_F_I...
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...ason for using shifts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > > > >
> > > > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> > > >
> > > > #define VRING_DESC_F_I...
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...d ring.
> > + * Notice: they are defined as shifts instead of shifted values.
>
>
> This looks inconsistent to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?
Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
number, not a shifted value:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
>
>
> > + */
> > +#define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_AVAIL 7
> > +#define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_USED 15
> > +
> > /* The Host uses this in used->flags to advise the Guest: don't kick me when
> > * you add a buffer. It's unreliable, so it...
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...>
> > > > This looks inconsistent to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?
> > >
> > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > number, not a shifted value:
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> >
> > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
>
> Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
>
> #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT 2
> #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT (1ull << VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_S...
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > > >
> > > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> > >
> > > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> > >
> > > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT 2
> > >...
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
...t; > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit
> > > > > > > number, not a shifted value:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow:
> > > > >
> > > &g...
2014 Mar 19
1
Centos6 x86_64
Hi,
I just tried to generate keys for tinc.
/usr/sbin/tinc generate-keys
When generating the key, the rsa key are generated.
But ik get de following error, what does it means.
Generating ECDSA keypair:
Generating EC key failed: error:100AE081:elliptic curve
routines:EC_GROUP_new_by_curve_name:unknown groupError during key
generation!
Perry