Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9392365".
Did you mean:
372365
2017 Feb 09
8
Checksums for git repo content?
Hi all,
Since the vault for 7.3.1611 has been cleared out last sunday (20170207)
- why is that? - I'm using git to download a "SRPM", or more accurately,
its contents.
However, using git has one major drawback: It is missing checksums for
the files.
Are there any plans to provide checksums for the files in git so I can
be sure that what I download is actually not tampered with?
2017 Feb 23
0
Checksums for git repo content?
...own. We're basically at the same place now with SHA-1
as we were in 2010 with MD5.
The full paper can be read at https://shattered.io/static/shattered.pdf
And an interesting discussion on git's potential handling of a SHA-1
collision on a blob is at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9392365/how-would-git-handle-a-sha-1-collision-on-a-blob
It may not be urgent, but it's not ridiculous.
2017 Feb 23
1
Checksums for git repo content?
...he same place now with SHA-1
> as we were in 2010 with MD5.
>
> The full paper can be read at https://shattered.io/static/shattered.pdf
>
> And an interesting discussion on git's potential handling of a SHA-1
> collision on a blob is at
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9392365/how-would-git-handle-a-sha-1-collision-on-a-blob
>
>
> It may not be urgent, but it's not ridiculous.
>
I think the issue is that you not only have to create a trojan file that
matches the same hash, but you have to create a trojan file that matches
the same hash and doesn't...