Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "936a110".
2013 Feb 07
11
[RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
provided as an array of struct scatterlist.
Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into
a scatterlist internal to the driver. It cannot just use the one that
was prepared by the
2013 Feb 07
11
[RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
provided as an array of struct scatterlist.
Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into
a scatterlist internal to the driver. It cannot just use the one that
was prepared by the
2013 Feb 12
12
[PATCH 0/9] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the
scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block
or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly
from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device.
virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific
step in the device driver, and generic
2013 Feb 12
12
[PATCH 0/9] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the
scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block
or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly
from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device.
virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific
step in the device driver, and generic
2013 Feb 19
24
[PATCH 00/16] virtio ring rework.
OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are
candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure
about.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Paolo Bonzini (3):
scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end
virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req
virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path
Rusty Russell (13):
virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs.
virtio-blk:
2013 Feb 19
24
[PATCH 00/16] virtio ring rework.
OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are
candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure
about.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Paolo Bonzini (3):
scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end
virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req
virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path
Rusty Russell (13):
virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs.
virtio-blk:
2013 Mar 18
28
[PATCH 00/22] virtqueue_add_sgs, virtqueue_add_outbuf, virtqueue_add_inbuf
Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf,
which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf
and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally
delete virtqueue_add_buf().
I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can
move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next.
Thanks!
Rusty.
Paolo
2013 Mar 18
28
[PATCH 00/22] virtqueue_add_sgs, virtqueue_add_outbuf, virtqueue_add_inbuf
Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf,
which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf
and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally
delete virtqueue_add_buf().
I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can
move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next.
Thanks!
Rusty.
Paolo