search for: 93446e93

...s type reductions, and I don't understand why. --Pekka -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TypeValue.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 16812 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101005/93446e93/attachment.obj>

>>>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type. >>>> >> >> I thought about that more, and I think the "right" way would be to have a syntax like >> >> !21 = metadata !{ type %struct.T, metadata !11 } >> >> or perhaps >> >> !21 = metadata

On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Pekka Nikander wrote: >>>> Would the right starting point be to simply add an MDNode pointer to the Type class? That should be then convertible to a DIType? >>> >>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type. >>> >>> !11 = metadata !{i32