Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "92uu0x".
Did you mean:
9250x
2019 Feb 20
3
Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve FQDN, only short hostname
Hai,
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mgr.
> Peter Tuharsky via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 20 februari 2019 10:28
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve
> FQDN, only short hostname
>
> Well, the mystery is solved. It WAS Avahi, in a way...
2019 Feb 20
0
Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve FQDN, only short hostname
...; 'mdns4_minimal' and 'mdns4' entries.
>
> Possible yes, but if correctly setup, not needed.
> And a bit ahead thinking people... Future systems, will mostly use
> systemd, if we like it or not.
Seemingly not on a Tesla:
https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/92uu0x/model_3_has_a_hidden_web_browser/
Rowland
2019 Feb 20
2
Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve FQDN, only short hostname
...l' and 'mdns4' entries.
>> Possible yes, but if correctly setup, not needed.
>> And a bit ahead thinking people... Future systems, will mostly use
>> systemd, if we like it or not.
> Seemingly not on a Tesla:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/92uu0x/model_3_has_a_hidden_web_browser/
>
> Rowland
>
>
2019 Feb 20
2
Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve FQDN, only short hostname
...l' and 'mdns4' entries.
>> Possible yes, but if correctly setup, not needed.
>> And a bit ahead thinking people... Future systems, will mostly use
>> systemd, if we like it or not.
> Seemingly not on a Tesla:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/92uu0x/model_3_has_a_hidden_web_browser/
>
> Rowland
>
>