Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "92df9353".
Did you mean:
52df9453
2012 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>> +dvyukov
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello folks (and sorry if I've forgotten to CC anyone with
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?
...maintenance problems.... but who knows, maybe?
>>>>
>>>> - Other ideas?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120619/92df9353/attachment.html>
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> +dvyukov
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello folks (and sorry if I've forgotten to CC anyone with particular
>> interest to this discussion...):
>>
>> I've been thinking a lot about how best to build