Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "92955".
Did you mean:
2955
2016 Mar 21
3
Need help with code generation
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:33 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
wrote:
> But you're surely not suggesting that lld will segfault as an error
> handling mode in production?
>
The document clearly states that (a) it is user's responsibility to give
sane object files, and (b) a corrupted file may cause a fatal error or SEGV.
> You say this was decided in a
2016 Mar 21
3
Need help with code generation
...a thread recently- could you please point me
> >> at that? I find this really hard to believe.
> >
> > Please find it yourself, that was a long thread.
>
> Not helpful. The thread appears to be available here:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92955.
>
> >The current decision was
> > not made lightly, so please respect that and take your time to understand
> > the situation.
>
> It was, however, made extremely controversially.
>
That is I guess we needed a decision. And the decision was made for not
sparking the...
2008 Feb 28
0
CESA-2008:0146 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) gd - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0146
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0146.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/gd-2.0.28-5.4E.c4.1.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/gd-devel-2.0.28-5.4E.c4.1.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/gd-progs-2.0.28-5.4E.c4.1.s390.rpm
s390x:
2016 Mar 21
8
Need help with code generation
We do not enable exceptions and longjmp is not safe. Also, if it can
segfault for some pathetic input, "it longjmps in most cases" doesn't help
people who wants 100% guarantee like you.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
wrote:
> If it can exit, why can't it longjmp back to a library consumer at least?
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar