search for: 9267a6c7

[Adding llvm-dev back to list] On 8 February 2017 at 11:12, Gaetano Checinski <gaetano.checinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing your insights, > so in theory i could build an llvm pass that calls TargetLowering::LowerToTLSEmulatedModel for each llvm::Function and it should work if i link a runtime that provides __emultls_get_address. I'm afraid not, that function is

...). > > It's probably measured in days even for someone who knows many of the > details already though. > > Cheers. > > Tim. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170209/9267a6c7/attachment.html>

> Unfortunately it doesn't look like lli has support for emulated TLS either, though that would be pretty simple to add. As an experiment I've `llvm::createLowerEmuTLSPass` into lli which added @__emutls_v.x and @__emutls_v.t. However i didn't have any __emultls_get_address calls in my IR. Is there a llvm pass or compiler-flag that replaces thread_locals with appropriate