search for: 9264e5d8

Hi Chandler, > So, I see where you're going here, but I'm curious -- why not just switch > ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP to have a second i1 value, and still be strong? Is this > *just* to support expanding? I wonder if that's really useful rather than > just lowering it directly on the various targets.... I tried that originally, but quickly got into murky waters with all the targets