Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "9241db53".
Did you mean:
921dbc53
2012 Jun 25
1
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux
I really don't see why this is the correct fix.
1) I like including the system's headers. It ensures that the interceptor
DTRT.
2) It's hardly the only system header you pull in here
3) I think we should probably match what glibc does when declaring these
routines. any reason to avoid this?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>