Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "91mb".
Did you mean:
1mb
2017 Oct 27
5
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...e single
stream >9000Mbit/s
Here is my current gluster performance:
Single brick on server 1 (server 2 was similar):
Fuse mount:
1000MB/s write
325MB/s read
Distributed only servers 1+2:
Fuse mount on server 1:
900MB/s write iozone 4 streams
320MB/s read iozone 4 streams
single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M
simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files
Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read
Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read
I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and
got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not
good.
Th...
2017 Oct 30
0
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...gluster performance:
>
> Single brick on server 1 (server 2 was similar):
> Fuse mount:
> 1000MB/s write
> 325MB/s read
>
> Distributed only servers 1+2:
> Fuse mount on server 1:
> 900MB/s write iozone 4 streams
> 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams
> single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M
> simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files
> Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read
> Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read
>
> I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations
> and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but tha...
2017 Oct 27
0
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...ster performance:
>
> Single brick on server 1 (server 2 was similar):
> Fuse mount:
> 1000MB/s write
> 325MB/s read
>
> Distributed only servers 1+2:
> Fuse mount on server 1:
> 900MB/s write iozone 4 streams
> 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams
> single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M
> simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files
> Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read
> Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read
>
> I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that...
2006 Aug 30
7
AAF Sorting by date - what am I doing wrong?
I''m trying to sort my search results by Date, in descending order. I''ve
done quite a bit of reading through the forums here, and I''ve tried two
different suggestions.
This just returns results in the same order as a search without a sort:
sort_fields = []
sort_fields <<
Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_created_at",:reverse => :true)
2007 Oct 19
0
HVM Migration issues
...,
''store/ring-ref'': ''32766'', ''store/port'': ''2''}
1: sent 966903, skipped 16105, delta 9918ms, dom0 48%, target 68%,
sent 3194Mb/s, dirtied 59Mb/s 18117 pages
2: sent 17470, skipped 632, delta 6237ms, dom0 37%, target 68%, sent
91Mb/s, dirtied 5Mb/s 1038 pages
3: sent 995, skipped 28, delta 211ms, dom0 32%, target 39%, sent
154Mb/s, dirtied 92Mb/s 594 pages
4: sent 546, skipped 27, delta 175ms, dom0 35%, target 83%, sent
102Mb/s, dirtied 9Mb/s 53 pages
5: sent 49, skipped 5, delta 48ms, dom0 8%, target 37%, sent 33Mb/s,
dir...