search for: 90233e25

I don't know anything about Interix. It may be best to defer a true Win32 port. It's not just the time it would take to do it, it's the time to keep it up to date as LLVM evolves. The Win32 port will constantly break, and I don't have the time to keep fixing it. I've got my own time-consuming projects :) That said, the architectural issues should still be addressed. What

...9;t blame ya! Thanks, Jeff. Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040913/90233e25/attachment.sig>

Jeff, These are all reasons why the Win32 port doesn't exist today. LLVM is heavily influenced and implemented by Unix tools/concepts/facilities. Since building on Win32 will also be a problem, I think that we should just target cygwin as our Win32 solution for now and get that to work really well. I know cygwin is a slow pig, but at least we can get LLVM to work with it. We also have Interix