search for: 900mbit

...). Iperf between two nodes directly reports around 940Mbit/s. The CPUs are Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, the hosts are running debian wheezy (kernel 3.2.54-2), the aesni module is loaded. OpenSSL is at 1.0.1e. On tinc 1.0, with cipher aes-128-cbc and digest sha1, I managed to get around 900Mbit/s throughput (iperf, simplex, both tinc daemons at 90% CPU utilisation). Switching to a null-cipher came up with only marginally better throughput. Note, this is from memory, can't find my notes unfortunately. Reading about tinc 1.1, specifically the use of a GCM cipher suite to reduce the cos...

...add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000mbit ceil 1000mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:99 htb rate 900mbit ceil 1000mbit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:99 handle 99: sfq tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip sport 443 0xffff flowid 1:10 1:10 seems to be getting the correct traffic from port 80 an...

Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600

...ve use (on the server) is fine then, though fileservice speed is definitely maxed out at wirespeed when i run tests on a quiet network (spread between all the clients. single clients only manage around 350Mbit/sec, but i attribute that to windows, not the server, since it can talk scp at closer to 900Mbit/sec to another linux machine and i can run more than one ~300Mbit smb stream at a time to different clients). so i checked the smbd/nmbd/winbindd logs and see nothing strange. i fire up wireshark on the clients and holy crap there is a lot of traffic when there should be none! i filtered out bro...

...:1 classid 1:10 htb rate $RATE_HIGH ceil $CEIL_HIGH prio 1 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate $RATE_DEFAULT ceil $CEIL_DEFAULT prio 3 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate $RATE_P2P ceil $CEIL_P2P prio 5 tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:1 classid 2:20 htb rate 900Mbit ceil 1Gbit prio 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:1 classid 2:30 htb rate $RATE_P2P ceil $CEIL_P2P prio 5 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:30 handle 30: sfq perturb 10 Please po...

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre12 of the GPL PV drivers for Windows. Since -pre10 (and -pre11) I''ve fixed a heap of crashes that were plaguing xennet under load, and also rewritten the interrupt/event distribution logic to improve performance. Under windows 2003 I can now get network speeds of 1-2Gbit/second TX and 600Gbit/second RX, which is considerably better than I was

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre12 of the GPL PV drivers for Windows. Since -pre10 (and -pre11) I''ve fixed a heap of crashes that were plaguing xennet under load, and also rewritten the interrupt/event distribution logic to improve performance. Under windows 2003 I can now get network speeds of 1-2Gbit/second TX and 600Gbit/second RX, which is considerably better than I was