search for: 900kb

...decoder, I try to save all huffman table in flash ROM then don't need to extract the tables from file stream and save in RAM when decoding. Successfully reducing RAM usetage to about 30KB when windows size is 2048 max. But then I find total huffman table used by vorbis 1.0 save in ROM is about 900kB. It is too big. Any way to reduce it? You can't save the tables in rom at all; there is no guarantee whatsoever that the tables will be the same for every file. In fact, they generally are not. 900kB sounds way too big, by the way. What version of Vorbis are you using? Please direct any fur...

...: http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TDM400P (or a better product)? If the network approach is possible why are we having so much problems just capturing the digits people are pressing? The machine is connected directly to a T1 that has at least 900kb up and down available at any time and is 3GHz with decent specs. What is the problem here? (Asterisk 1.0.9) Thanks for any input, Michael

...ily here as a user. 2. Is the Linux USB subsystem already known to be prone to stability issues like this, or am I just having some bad luck on this machine? 3. What's the polite way to supply the list with large attachments, such as log extracts (~10kB) and photos of kernel crash screens (~900kB)? Many thanks in advance, Paul.

...samba 4.3 package we could manage to build is around 9-12MB or 4.9MB lzma compressed using this makefile + some multicall/static linking hacks/patches: https://github.com/wongsyrone/openwrt-1/tree/master/package/external /samba43related/samba43 In contrast Samba 3.6 can be stripped down to around 900kb (lzma), which is not a problem for 8MB nvram targets. I tried to base my build on the buildroot example and create a normal shared lib package, since i don't like to maintain all the multicall patches and the size gain over the shared version is just about 20%, which don't really brings us...

I am trying to build Clang/LLVM with -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON to reduce the size of toolchain. I am getting LINK error 1181 about `lib\LLVM.lib` not found. After investigating, `lib\LLVM.lib` is supposed to be produced along with `bin\LLVM.dll`. `bin\LLVM.dll` is indeed produced, but it does not contain any exported symbols (10KB only) because LLVM does not use

...ify, is the ELF output from LLD also "large", or is it just the output from the llvm-objcopy operating on that ELF that is "large"? Do you have a simple sample to demonstrate this issue?" The ELF size is actually smaller, compared to what was generated from LLVM 7.x. (~900Kb vs ~250Kb) When we run llvm-objcopy -O Binary blah.elf blah.bin, it would generate a 400Mb binary file. I presume the `noload` flag used in `InputSection` is not properly enforced throughout the code. CommitSection is not applied to .heap and .stack section as I can recall during my debug.......

...I've written about it a few times to the samba list, and to comp.protocols.smb, but no good responses yet, except that I'm not the only one, and 1.9.18 may be better. So I downloaded and compiled 1.9.18p10 for kicks, and found that the smbclient there has excellent performance! Now I get 900KB/s puts instead of 9K/s puts with the smbclient compiled from 2.0.3. This is writing to a Windows-95 machine, and from a Linux-2.2.7/glibc-2.1/egcs-1.1.2 machine. I straced the two clients to try to figure out why the new one sucks so bad, and I've found a clue: smbclient-2.0.3 seems to only...

I am running Win 98 SE and have a Samba server v2.0.5 on a FreeBSD 3.3 system. Both machines sit on the same 100baseTX subnet. I am seeing expected read performance, but writes from Win98 to the Samba share are terrible; upwards of 30 seconds to copy a 900kb file (yes, that's kb). This happens in both Explorer, the DOS "shell", and in the application that actually created the file (i.e., when I go to File->Save). I've read the documentation on the Win98 Explorer slowdown, but I haven't seen references to performance issues in...

Hello gurus, I have samba fileserver 2.0.5a installed on Reliant UNIX 5.44 (Siemens UNIX). All works fine but now I need to get as much speed from it as it can provide. I have this UNIX box and an NT 4.0 Server in the same FDDI ring. When I try to copy an 180 Mb file via FTP to local hard disk the transfer rate is 1014,16 Kb/sec. But while copying it from the samba share to the same location by

Dear R Team, First, thank you for incredibly useful software! Now the bad news: The attached script (or the original version with real data) will reliably crash R on my machine. I am using: R version: either 2.2.1 or 2.3.1 Windows 2000 Professional, Service Pack 4 512 MB of RAM On my machine the script will crash R on line 42 [ probits21 <- lapply(... ]. In both this script and the

When using write.table() to write data frames the integer columns are padded with unnecessary spaces (0x20) so that these columns are right align if you look at them in a text editor. However, I think it is quite a vast of file size. For instance, I am reading a tab-delimited 4200kb microarray data file and writing it back verbatim using write.table() and it becomes 5100kb, a 20% increase. Is this

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:51:16PM +0300, Sviatoslav Sviridov/Lintec Project wrote: > > Sorry for direct reply, but mail server at samba.org blocks my messages. Postmasters, Martin, For your consideration. > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:43:54 +0300 > From: Sviatoslav Sviridov/Lintec Project <svd@lintec.minsk.by> > To: rsync@lists.samba.org

Hi, hm at seneca.muc.de schrieb am 29.05.03 21:40:34: > I would like to load pxelinux as a second stage bootloader from a machine > which does not have a PXE BIOS (namely, from a VMware guest machine) in > order to perform an automated Linux installation. A boot floppy would > be nice. It seems that there are some commercial solutions around but > is there someting in the OSS

...ent-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >hm at seneca.muc.de wrote: > > >Anyway I tried pxelinux-2.03 now instead of 2.04 which produces the >crash. > >2.03 works slooooooow within a VM but it works. It actually takes more > >than 5 minutes to TFTP a 900KB kernel and a 5MB initrd. Which makes it > >like 20-25 KB/s. > > > >Does anybody have an idea what _is_ so slow here? > > > >- Is it pxelinux' TFTP client within a VM? > > > > >I am not sure of the cause. However, using the rfbg floppy on a real >...

Hi LLVM devs,  I came across an LLD bug in v 10.x where ELF parser / processor is setting .PROGBITS attribute for .heap and .stack sections, which leads to large binaries when we do `llvm-objcopy -o binary` to generate the binary output for armv6m. (e.g. for a 57Kb elf would yield a ~400Mb binary). This in comparison with LLVM 7.x , would produce the correct binary size of 35Kb and the

I'm trying to figure out how to handle our fax line when we switch to our asterisk for voice. After a lot of reading and poking about I have concluded, as have many others it would seem, that the best thing to do is either to have a separate pstn fax line or use some sort of internet faxing service rather than try and make faxing work in a way it's not meant to over voip lines.

Hello, I try to create some kind of mail backup system. What I need is system that will store mail for the whole domain, and allow me to restore messages from/to specified email at that domain. The scheme is pretty simple: on our main mail server the SMTP server itself has a rule to send a copy of every message to 'backup at backupserver.host', and the backupserver.host domain is

...pares to about 2mb per second on gets >and 6mb per second on puts with FTP. All the machines involved are using >LinkSys Etherfast 10/100 cards connected to a LinkSys 10/100 hub. >Oddly enough when I connected a 10mbit/s client to the hub and tried samba >out I got about 750kb/s put and 900kb/s get. . . If anyone can explain this >I'm listening :) >-- > >Who is this General Failure, and why is he reading my hard disk? > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT) >From: <jeremy@xxedgexx.com> >To: cbrink &l...