search for: 9.8

Just to be safe and maybe interesting for others as well: Louis, is it safe to upgrade a Debian 9.7 on which I run your samba-packages to deb 9.8? I assume so, but prefer to ask in advance ;-) good morning all, Stefan

Am 21.02.19 um 15:49 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Or... > > Set the creator group option. > > [Daten] > comment = Daten > create mask = 3660 > directory mask = 3770 did so, they test now. thanks

Am 21.02.19 um 19:19 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 21.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >> Am 21.02.19 um 15:49 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >>> Or... >>> >>> Set the creator group option. >>> >>> [Daten] >>> comment = Daten >>> create mask = 3660 >>> directory mask =

Hi Stefan, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 10:43 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos > > Am 18.02.19 um 08:38 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Goood morning Stefan, ( and

hi, I have a question about merging two files. For example, I have two files, the first file is like the following: id trait1 1 10.2 2 11.1 3 9.7 6 10.2 7 8.9 10 9.7 11 10.2 The second file is like the following: id trait2 1 9.8 2 10.8 4 7.8 5 9.8 6 10.1 12 10.2 13 10.1 now I want to merge the two files by the variable "id", I only want

I upgraded by S3 domain to S4 using the upgrade script. To do that i had to have the S4 test box connected to the production network. Now I want to take it to the test network. But the Bind 9.8.x instance using the DLZ still has the old address... dynamic dns update doesn't work because the tool can't find the KDC because DNS returns the wrong IP address. Can I modify the DNS zone

I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source, and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with the include line for samba in /etc/named.conf: get: "dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 2 should be 1 in '/usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so'" Help!

Hi, I use Samba4 domain controler since 4.0 version over Debian. Today I use Debian 9.8 and Samba 4.9.6 without problems in many productions environments. Last week I decide make a test with Debian 9.8 and Samba 4.10. All ocours very fine trough compile process but when I try create domain with 'samba-tool domain provision" nothing happen. The shell freeze and the process don't go

Hai Stefan, Yes, thats correct, you should have rebooted. ;-) The reboot is required in the update due to the kernel updates. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 21 februari 2019 10:20 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]

Or... Set the creator group option. [Daten] comment = Daten create mask = 3660 directory mask = 3770 path = /mnt/daten read only = No Greetz, Now you can more easy mix windows and linux acls. Test it Stefan, but file now created are now forced to set the "Creator group" its primay group, Which should be "Domain users" I suggest, create a few files from linux

Hai Stefan, How are you telling its outdated? And dont delete it if you would re-created it. Move it away/backup it. But this would help you. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Keytab_Extraction Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari

Has anyone gotten SmartSuite Millenium Edition 9.8 to actually run under KUbuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala). The install failes miserably for me.

Am 21.02.19 um 15:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Apart from a missing line: > > idmap config arbeitsgruppe : schema_mode = rfc2307 > > There doesn't seem to be anything really wrong. Added, thanks. Since my last mail I tested more and we found that ACLs were missing wrong, so I applied an ACL to give group "domain users" rwx here. Is create mask still

Good morning Stefan, Hmm, yes, i notice some things also with the debian 9.8 upgrade, that killed my kopano server. Was a long night yesterday. :-( but fixed. Ive done all my servers here and no samba problems. I do know of more problems with docker. There is a small difference, i dont know exact were, but i detected that on the kopano forum. Kopano builds it packages within docker, the

Stefan, If everythig works now. Then keep it as is. Most probly it was the firewall that caused the problem. @Rowland, good point. Im everytime amazed with all the commands you know.. :-) And SID: S-1-5-21domain-513 = domain users. These are "Samba Sids" S-1-22-[1-2] 1 useres 2 groups And thats corect with wbinfo -g 10513 shows all groups. Greetz, Louis >

Hello rowland, > > hang on a bit, the Debian link is for bind 9.8.x and the dlz reference > is for 9.8.1.dfsg-1. > I don?t recomend to use Bind 9.8.1 / 9.8.2 anymore - most distro use it but the shuold move due DLZ compile & bind bugs. and 9.8 soon goes on end of Life see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01211/81/BIND-9.8.8-Release-Notes.html > Rowland > This just

Hi I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According to https://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Regards ian

# Global parameters [global] interfaces = bond0 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 5 auth:5 winbind:8 printcap name = /dev/null realm = SOMEDOM.AT security = ADS username map = /etc/samba/user.map winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes workgroup = ARBEITSGRUPPE idmap config arbeitsgruppe:unix_nss_info = yes idmap config arbeitsgruppe:range =

Hai, Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs. ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything.. Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's. I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted, and no problems before and after. So its bit hard to detect whats going on at your side. Are all you servers having this or a few.

Am 22.02.19 um 15:16 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:03:37 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hai, >> >> That bond0 interface, you might want to change that the interface >> name to bond1 Depending on the bonding settings, you might have hit a >> reserved name. I lots my docu