search for: 8yzj

Hi all, As you probably know, we’ll meet on the first day of the conference, right before lunch, to discuss about a possible move of our hosting to Git/GitHub, and consider the various options and associated tradeoff (Schedule entry here: http://sched.co/8Yzj <http://sched.co/8Yzj> ) I’d like to remind you that the detail of the proposals and the variants is online here: http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html <http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html> ; and that a survey is opened here: https://goo.gl/forms/ZYs0Wv9g0w0ikCRQ2 &...

...is that there is a single document proposal for moving to GitHub, and it is mentioning multiple variants. It is published here: http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html <http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html> and it is also attached to the Dev Meeting Schedule: http://sched.co/8Yzj <http://sched.co/8Yzj> We need now a survey that *matches* the proposal document, because that is what will be discussed at the meeting. The document contains already this variant: http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#multi-mono-hybrid-variant <http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/Gi...

> On Oct 13, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I don't understand your concerns. > > First, the choice between sub-modules and mono-repo has been put > forward as the only two choices because people felt that, if we let it > open, we'd have too many different implementation details and we'd >