search for: 8h47

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8h47".

Did you mean: 847
2017 Aug 07
0
Volume hacked
.....) when the disk got suppressed was still working. I'm a bit surpised they could be deleted, but I imagine qemu through libgfapi doesn't really access the file as a whole, maybe just the part it needs when it needs it. In any case the gluster logs show clearly file descriptor errors from 8h47 AM UTC, which seems to match our first monitoring alerts. I assume that's when the deletion happened. Now I just need to figure out what they used to access the volume, I hope it's just NFS since that's the only thing I can think of. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text a...
2017 Aug 07
2
Volume hacked
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 08:54:33PM +0100, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: > Thinking about it, is it even normal they managed to delete the VM disks? > Shoudn't they have gotten "file in use" errors ? Or does libgfapi not > lock the access files ? It really depends on the application if locks are used. Most (Linux) applications will use advisory locks. This means that