search for: 8f3e

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "8f3e".

Did you mean: 8.3e
2006 Dec 15
2
Per-process QoS on Linux?
...w traffic priority to one software, and an higher one to another... is there any way to get that accomplished? -- Alan Franzoni <alan.franzoni.xyz@gmail.com> - Togli .xyz dalla mia email per contattarmi. Remove .xyz from my address in order to contact me. - GPG Key Fingerprint (Key ID = FE068F3E): 5C77 9DC3 BD5B 3A28 E7BC 921A 0255 42AA FE06 8F3E _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2019 Feb 19
2
samba acl it
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Andrew Bartlett via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 18:40 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba acl it > > On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 17:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:15:17 +1300 > >
2007 Dec 02
2
Bidirectional rsync with "trash" support
...f from potential errors. Google didn't help me in my search. Has anybody heard about something like that? -- Alan Franzoni <alan.franzoni.xyz@gmail.com> - Togli .xyz dalla mia email per contattarmi. Remove .xyz from my address in order to contact me. - GPG Key Fingerprint (Key ID = FE068F3E): 5C77 9DC3 BD5B 3A28 E7BC 921A 0255 42AA FE06 8F3E -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2009 Jan 12
1
Deliver *sometimes* delivers via /tmp?
...ly mislabeled files (./tmp). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 4b6a49fd-c1f8-40f9-98fa-dfe971719c69 Jan 6 16:44:29 jukebox setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing the deliver from using potentially mislabeled files (./tmp). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 19445c54-9537-45ec-8f3e-7718364b1f1f Jan 6 16:44:29 jukebox setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing the deliver from using potentially mislabeled files (./dovecot.deliver..1231256667.7940.53f0f908f5a97712). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 0cb74c68-0bbb-4de6-a15f-0bb5fdffcf90 Jan 6 16:44:29 jukebox setroubles...
2018 Apr 03
0
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
...node = 955a5e78-ab4c-499a-89f8-511e041167fb [2018-04-03 02:07:57.989748] W [MSGID: 109009] [dht-common.c:2570:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7: gfid differs on subvolume ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3, gfid local = efbb9be5-0744-4883-8f3e-e8f7ce8d7741, gfid node = 955a5e78-ab4c-499a-89f8-511e041167fb [2018-04-03 02:07:57.989827] I [MSGID: 109069] [dht-common.c:2095:dht_lookup_unlink_stale_linkto_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Returned with op_ret -1 and op_errno 2 for /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.3 [2018-04-03 02:07...
2018 Apr 06
1
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
...-ab4c-499a-89f8-511e041167fb > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.989748] W [MSGID: 109009] > [dht-common.c:2570:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: > /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7: gfid differs on subvolume > ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3, gfid local = efbb9be5-0744-4883-8f3e-e8f7ce8d7741, > gfid node = 955a5e78-ab4c-499a-89f8-511e041167fb > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.989827] I [MSGID: 109069] > [dht-common.c:2095:dht_lookup_unlink_stale_linkto_cbk] > 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Returned with op_ret -1 and op_errno 2 for > /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c...
2018 Mar 26
1
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
Ian, Do you've a reproducer for this bug? If not a specific one, a general outline of what operations where done on the file will help. regards, Raghavendra On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> > wrote: > >> The gfid mismatch
2018 Mar 26
3
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote: > The gfid mismatch here is between the shard and its "link-to" file, the > creation of which happens at a layer below that of shard translator on the > stack. > > Adding DHT devs to take a look. > Thanks Krutika. I assume shard doesn't do any dentry operations like rename,