Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "8eafe714".
Did you mean:
8eace14
2020 Mar 05
2
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
...using the
> latest version of MS Outlook.
>
I think I was confusing it with the last working version. 2010 didn't
have the issue. 2013 has/had it.
Here is the thread I bookmarked when trying to resolve this before
giving up and shelving it:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8eafe714-8a8c-44bc-9228-d6a68731494f/outlook-2013-behavior-as-an-imap-client
I think nothing has been fixed as Outlook still does APPEND.
Regards,
Claudius
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200305/7b6b8...
2020 Mar 05
0
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
...on of MS Outlook.
>>
>I think I was confusing it with the last working version. 2010 didn't
>have the issue. 2013 has/had it.
>
>Here is the thread I bookmarked when trying to resolve this before
>giving up and shelving it:
>https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8eafe714-8a8c-44bc-9228-d6a68731494f/outlook-2013-behavior-as-an-imap-client
>
>I think nothing has been fixed as Outlook still does APPEND.
Again, these are obsoleted versions of MS Outlook. The latest official
release is the 2019 version. I am actually using the beta version, but
I doubt that it wo...
2020 Mar 05
4
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
I have given up on using any spam training with Outlook because Outlook
seems rebuild the mails when you touch them.
What it broke here:
* Received Headers reshuffled and useless
* x-mailer set to outlook
There are multiple bug reports about this and MS seems to have fixed it
once in Outlook 2010 but broke it again sometime later.
I would be careful not to spam-report yourself with those mails
2015 Mar 10
2
Outlook 2013/2010 nightmare #2
Yes Eric,
Outlook also has a declaration that as of either version 2010 or 2013,
they no longer download IMAP headers, they download the whole message -
thank God for faster Internet connections these days - could you imagine
that in the older dialup days? Still it is a waste of bandwidth and disk
space to do this.
I am so tired of how they claim to use the RFC and indicate they are